NSF/CASIS Collaboration on Tissue Engineering and Mechanobiology on the International Space Station (ISS) to Benefit Life on Earth (nsf24502) | NSF

NSF Funding (complete) obtainable beneath this solicitation is as much as $1.6 million to be distributed in FY 2024. Funds requests could also be for as much as $400,000 complete, direct and oblique prices, and as much as three years in period. The award measurement and period must be in keeping with the mission scope. Collaborative tasks from a number of organizations are accepted, in keeping with commonplace NSF procedures. The whole price range for a collaborative mission from a number of organizations should not exceed $400,000.

Estimated program price range, variety of awards and common award measurement/period are topic to the provision of funds.

Funding for ISS Experiments:

NSF awards beneath this solicitation will present PIs with help to conduct elementary and translational analysis to arrange experiments for execution on-board the ISS, to collaborate with service suppliers as crucial, to offer preliminary evaluation to conduct the experiment, to research and interpret knowledge, and to disseminate outcomes broadly. CASIS will help recipients in translating ground-based experiments and applied sciences into space-appropriate {hardware} the place attainable. Prices related to the interpretation of the proposed experiments to flight experiments on-board the ISS, together with the coaching of ISS crews, transporting the experiment payload and gear to the ISS, and conducting experiments on the ISS, shall be supported by CASIS by means of their cooperative settlement with NASA.

CASIS could present funding to Business Implementation Companions for PIs to make the most of current flight {hardware} and amenities to help proposed analysis however be aware that proposals requiring important modifications to {hardware} or the event of recent capabilities shall be out of scope for this solicitation. Funds requests for industrial implementation companies supported by CASIS are capped at $450,000 complete per proposal. For data on obtainable flight {hardware} for this solicitation, please contact representatives from the totally different Implementation Companions providing companies and {hardware} by means of this proposal https://www.issnationallab.org/research-on-the-iss/solicitations/rfp2024-2/. Please contact the CASIS operations group ([email protected]) if in case you have any questions or issues.

Each organizations will collectively handle the mission evaluations. All NSF awards shall be made by way of a Normal Grant mechanism. As well as, NSF recipients shall be required to barter separate circumstances with CASIS for ISS utilization help. CASIS’ Agreements comprise non-negotiable provisions that are obligatory and can’t be altered. If an award recipient doesn’t need to or can not adjust to such obligatory move down provisions, it mustn’t settle for the award alternative.

IV. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION

Who Could Submit Proposals:

Proposals could solely be submitted by the next:

Establishments of Increased Schooling (IHEs) – Two- and four-year IHEs (together with group faculties) accredited in, and having a campus positioned within the US, appearing on behalf of their school members. Particular Directions for Worldwide Department Campuses of US IHEs: If the proposal contains funding to be supplied to a world department campus of a US establishment of upper schooling (together with by means of use of subawards and marketing consultant preparations), the proposer should clarify the profit(s) to the mission of efficiency on the worldwide department campus, and justify why the mission actions can’t be carried out on the US campus.
Non-profit, non-academic organizations: Unbiased museums, observatories, analysis laboratories, skilled societies and comparable organizations positioned within the U.S. which can be instantly related to instructional or analysis actions.
For-profit organizations: U.S.-based industrial organizations, together with small companies, with sturdy capabilities in scientific or engineering analysis or schooling and a ardour for innovation.

Who Could Function PI:

The PI and any co-PIs should qualify as “U.S. Individuals” beneath 22 U.S. Code §6010:

“‘United States particular person’ means any United States citizen or alien admitted for everlasting residence in the US, and any company, partnership, or different group organized beneath the legal guidelines of the US.”

Restrict on Variety of Proposals per Group:

There aren’t any restrictions or limits.

Restrict on Variety of Proposals per PI or co-PI: 1

An investigator could solely be a PI, co-PI, or different Senior Personnel on one proposal submitted beneath this solicitation in a given fiscal 12 months. The submitting group is answerable for making certain that the PI and all co-PI(s) and different Senior Personnel are taking part in just one proposal. If a person exceeds this restrict, the primary proposal submitted to incorporate this particular person shall be accepted and the rest shall be returned with out overview. No exceptions shall be made.

Recipients on lively NSF-CASIS Tissue Engineering/Mechanobiology grants could not function a PI, co-PI, or different Senior Personnel on a subsequent NSF-CASIS Tissue Engineering/Mechanobiology proposal till the lively award is closed.

Implementation Companions are exempt from the above limits on the variety of proposals per PI or co-PI.

Further Eligibility Data:

Grant Alternatives for Tutorial Liaison with Business (GOALI) proposals, the place academe and business accomplice on a analysis mission, are inspired (see PAPPG Chapter II.F.5 for added data).

V. PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

A. Proposal Preparation Directions

Full Proposal Preparation Directions: Proposers could decide to submit proposals in response to this Program Solicitation by way of Analysis.gov or Grants.gov.

Full Proposals submitted by way of Analysis.gov: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation must be ready and submitted in accordance with the overall pointers contained within the NSF Proposal and Award Insurance policies and Procedures Information (PAPPG). The whole textual content of the PAPPG is obtainable electronically on the NSF web site at: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg. Paper copies of the PAPPG could also be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, phone (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail from [email protected]. The Put together New Proposal setup will immediate you for this system solicitation quantity.
Full proposals submitted by way of Grants.gov: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation by way of Grants.gov must be ready and submitted in accordance with the NSF Grants.gov Utility Information: A Information for the Preparation and Submission of NSF Functions by way of Grants.gov. The whole textual content of the NSF Grants.gov Utility Information is obtainable on the Grants.gov web site and on the NSF web site at: (https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=grantsgovguide). To acquire copies of the Utility Information and Utility Varieties Package deal, click on on the Apply tab on the Grants.gov website, then click on on the Apply Step 1: Obtain a Grant Utility Package deal and Utility Directions hyperlink and enter the funding alternative quantity, (this system solicitation quantity with out the NSF prefix) and press the Obtain Package deal button. Paper copies of the Grants.gov Utility Information additionally could also be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, phone (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail from [email protected].

In figuring out which technique to make the most of within the digital preparation and submission of the proposal, please be aware the next:

Collaborative Proposals. All collaborative proposals submitted as separate submissions from a number of organizations have to be submitted by way of Analysis.gov. PAPPG Chapter II.E.3 offers extra data on collaborative proposals.

See PAPPG Chapter II.D.2 for steerage on the required sections of a full analysis proposal submitted to NSF. Please be aware that the proposal preparation directions supplied on this program solicitation could deviate from the PAPPG directions.

The next directions complement the steerage within the PAPPG and NSF Grants.gov Utility Information:

Feasibility Evaluate: All investigators who want to submit a proposal in response to this solicitation should submit a accomplished CASIS Feasibility Evaluate Type. The CASIS Feasibility Evaluate Type shall be obtainable on the CASIS web site: https://www.issnationallab.org/research-on-the-iss/solicitations/rfp2024-2/.

This CASIS Feasibility Evaluate Type have to be accomplished and submitted by way of the CASIS web site no later than January 15, 2024, to permit time for a response and time to arrange the complete proposal.

CASIS officers will reply to a Feasibility Evaluate Type inside 4 weeks after submission.

Documentation from the CASIS group confirming eligibility to submit a proposal after the operational feasibility overview have to be supplied as a Single Copy Doc. A proposal submitted with out the required authorizations shall be returned with out overview.

A proposal that passes the operational overview represents CASIS’s preliminary judgment that the mission could be applicable for consideration beneath this initiative; it isn’t a dedication to suggest help of a proposal with program funds. Documentation from the CASIS group confirming eligibility to submit a proposal after the operational evaluations have to be supplied as a Single Copy Doc. A proposal submitted with out the required authorizations shall be returned with out overview. For an outline in regards to the CASIS operational overview standards, please see https://www.issnationallab.org/research-on-the-iss/solicitations/rfp2024-2/
The proposal should explicitly deal with how the mission will make the most of the ISS capabilities and the way the analysis will profit life on Earth.

NSF recipients beneath this solicitation might want to execute an settlement with CASIS as a way to make the most of the ISS Nationwide Laboratory. Template agreements (https://www.issnationallab.org/research-on-the-iss/solicitations/rfp2024-2/) have been developed for this program to streamline the processes of forging partnerships between CASIS and recipients. As acknowledged above, CASIS’ agreements comprise obligatory move down provisions that are non-negotiable and can’t be altered. If an award recipient doesn’t need to or can not adjust to such provisions, it mustn’t settle for the award alternative.

Proposal Title: The mission title on the proposal Cowl Sheet shall be preceded by the prefix “ISS:” to differentiate the submission from a daily proposal that will undergo a daily overview course of. In the event you submit a proposal as a part of a set of collaborative proposals, the title of the proposals ought to start with “Collaborative Analysis: ISS:” adopted by your title. Please be aware that if submitting by way of Analysis.gov, the system will routinely insert the prepended title “Collaborative Analysis” when the collaborative set of proposals is created.

Venture Description: Along with the necessities specified within the PAPPG, the Venture Description should embody a separate part with the heading Profit to Life on Earth. This part ought to clearly describe the motivations for the mission and clarify the good thing about the potential outcomes of the mission for all times on Earth. Venture Descriptions must also:

Clearly clarify the need of the ISS to hold out the proposed mission.
Element how experiments shall be performed on the ISS and what, if any, floor experimental controls shall be utilized.
Embody a timeline the place milestones are clearly recognized in the course of the mission.
Specify current or proposed flight {hardware} (together with any crucial modification) for use within the mission. If new {hardware} improvement is proposed, proposals ought to describe design necessities, important parts, floor testing, improvement timelines, and projected improvement prices.

Supplementary Paperwork: Supplementary paperwork are restricted to the particular varieties of documentation listed within the PAPPG, with the next exceptions. The paperwork listed under have to be included in all proposals submitted to this name. For collaborative tasks from a number of organizations, these paperwork have to be included within the lead proposal submission solely.

Letters of Collaboration from Implementation Companions. A letter of collaboration from the implementation accomplice have to be included within the Particular Data and Supplementary Documentation part of the proposal. The format and content material of those letters should observe pointers outlined in PAPPG Chapter II.C.2.j.
Record of Venture Personnel and Associate Establishments. Present present, correct data for all personnel and establishments concerned within the mission, together with implementation companions. NSF employees will use this data within the advantage overview course of to handle reviewer choice. The checklist ought to embody all PIs, co-PIs, Senior Personnel, Collaborators, paid/unpaid Consultants, Subawardees, Postdocs, and project-level advisory committee members for the complete mission. This checklist must be numbered and embody (on this order) Full Identify, Organizations(s), and Function within the mission, with every merchandise separated by a semi-colon. Every particular person listed ought to begin a brand new numbered line. For instance:

First Identify Final Identify; Establishment; Function
First Identify Final Identify; Establishment; Function
First Identify Final Identify; Establishment; Function


Implementation Associate Assertion of Work. A 3-page or much less assertion of labor (SOW) from the Implementation Associate is required to be included as a Supplementary doc with the ultimate proposal. This assertion of labor is separate from the letter of collaboration. An appropriate SOW will comprise the next key components: a abstract of how the Implementation Associate’s choices align with the mission targets, an in depth scope of end-to-end mission administration (idea of operations, {hardware} availability, verification testing, and hazard identification/security overview strategy), a mission schedule, and an in depth price range for Implementation Associate prices, together with any driving assumptions and detailed prices for modification of {hardware}. The idea of operations ought to embody an estimate of mass/quantity, stowage necessities, energy necessities, and crew time with a foundation for the estimate.

Single Copy Paperwork: Documentation from the CASIS group confirming eligibility to submit a proposal after the operational evaluations have to be supplied as a Single Copy Doc.

Further Directions for Submission of a GOALI Proposal

When getting ready a GOALI proposal, choose this program solicitation quantity after which choose “GOALI” because the Kind of Proposal. The mission title on the proposal Cowl Sheet ought to start with “GOALI: ISS”. The proposal have to be ready in accordance with the GOALI particular directions in Chapter II.F.5 of the PAPPG and the extra directions contained on this solicitation. Please be aware that if submitting by way of Analysis.gov, the system will routinely insert the prepended title “GOALI” when the proposal is created.

B. Budgetary Data

Value Sharing:

Inclusion of voluntary dedicated value sharing is prohibited.

C. Due Dates

Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter’s native time):

     March 15, 2024

Potential proposers should submit a Feasibility Evaluate Type to the Heart for the Development of Science in House, Inc. (CASIS) by January 15, 2024. The shape shall be evaluated for operational feasibility and terrestrial profit. Proposers who’ve submitted Feasibility Evaluate Varieties that go the preliminary operational and terrestrial profit overview by CASIS shall be eligible to submit a full proposal for analysis by NSF.

D. Analysis.gov/Grants.gov Necessities

For Proposals Submitted Through Analysis.gov:

To arrange and submit a proposal by way of Analysis.gov, see detailed technical directions obtainable at: https://www.analysis.gov/research-portal/appmanager/base/desktop?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=research_node_display&_nodePath=/researchGov/Service/Desktop/ProposalPreparationandSubmission.html. For Analysis.gov consumer help, name the Analysis.gov Assist Desk at 1-800-381-1532 or e-mail [email protected]. The Analysis.gov Assist Desk solutions normal technical questions associated to using the Analysis.gov system. Particular questions associated to this program solicitation must be referred to the NSF program employees contact(s) listed in Part VIII of this funding alternative.

For Proposals Submitted Through Grants.gov:

Earlier than utilizing Grants.gov for the primary time, every group should register to create an institutional profile. As soon as registered, the applicant’s group can then apply for any federal grant on the Grants.gov web site. Complete details about utilizing Grants.gov is obtainable on the Grants.gov Applicant Assets webpage: https://www.grants.gov/internet/grants/candidates.html. As well as, the NSF Grants.gov Utility Information (see hyperlink in Part V.A) offers directions concerning the technical preparation of proposals by way of Grants.gov. For Grants.gov consumer help, contact the Grants.gov Contact Heart at 1-800-518-4726 or by electronic mail: [email protected]. The Grants.gov Contact Heart solutions normal technical questions associated to using Grants.gov. Particular questions associated to this program solicitation must be referred to the NSF program employees contact(s) listed in Part VIII of this solicitation.

Submitting the Proposal: As soon as all paperwork have been accomplished, the Licensed Organizational Consultant (AOR) should submit the applying to Grants.gov and confirm the specified funding alternative and company to which the applying is submitted. The AOR should then signal and submit the applying to Grants.gov. The finished utility shall be transferred to Analysis.gov for additional processing.

The NSF Grants.gov Proposal Processing in Analysis.gov informational web page offers submission steerage to candidates and hyperlinks to useful sources together with the NSF Grants.gov Utility Information, Grants.gov Proposal Processing in Analysis.gov how-to information, and Grants.gov Submitted Proposals Ceaselessly Requested Questions. Grants.gov proposals should go all NSF pre-check and post-check validations as a way to be accepted by Analysis.gov at NSF.

When submitting by way of Grants.gov, NSF strongly recommends candidates provoke proposal submission no less than 5 enterprise days prematurely of a deadline to permit sufficient time to deal with NSF compliance errors and resubmissions by 5:00 p.m. submitting group’s native time on the deadline. Please be aware that some errors can’t be corrected in Grants.gov. As soon as a proposal passes pre-checks however fails any post-check, an applicant can solely appropriate and submit the in-progress proposal in Analysis.gov.

Proposers that submitted by way of Analysis.gov could use Analysis.gov to confirm the standing of their submission to NSF. For proposers that submitted by way of Grants.gov, till an utility has been acquired and validated by NSF, the Licensed Organizational Consultant could test the standing of an utility on Grants.gov. After proposers have acquired an e-mail notification from NSF, Analysis.gov must be used to test the standing of an utility.

VI. NSF PROPOSAL PROCESSING AND REVIEW PROCEDURES

Proposals acquired by NSF are assigned to the suitable NSF program for acknowledgement and, in the event that they meet NSF necessities, for overview. All proposals are fastidiously reviewed by a scientist, engineer, or educator serving as an NSF Program Officer, and normally by three to 10 different individuals outdoors NSF both as advert hoc reviewers, panelists, or each, who’re consultants within the specific fields represented by the proposal. These reviewers are chosen by Program Officers charged with oversight of the overview course of. Proposers are invited to counsel names of individuals they consider are particularly effectively certified to overview the proposal and/or individuals they would like not overview the proposal. These recommendations could function one supply within the reviewer choice course of on the Program Officer’s discretion. Submission of such names, nevertheless, is non-compulsory. Care is taken to make sure that reviewers don’t have any conflicts of curiosity with the proposal. As well as, Program Officers could receive feedback from website visits earlier than recommending closing motion on proposals. Senior NSF employees additional overview suggestions for awards. A flowchart that depicts the complete NSF proposal and award course of (and related timeline) is included in PAPPG Exhibit III-1.

A complete description of the Basis’s advantage overview course of is obtainable on the NSF web site at: https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/coverage/merit_review/.

Proposers must also pay attention to core methods which can be important to the success of NSF’s mission, as articulated in Main the World in Discovery and Innovation, STEM Expertise Growth and the Supply of Advantages from Analysis – NSF Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years (FY) 2022 – 2026. These methods are built-in in this system planning and implementation course of, of which proposal overview is one half. NSF’s mission is especially well-implemented by means of the combination of analysis and schooling and broadening participation in NSF applications, tasks, and actions.

One of many strategic targets in help of NSF’s mission is to foster integration of analysis and schooling by means of the applications, tasks, and actions it helps at tutorial and analysis establishments. These establishments should recruit, prepare, and put together a various STEM workforce to advance the frontiers of science and take part within the U.S. technology-based economic system. NSF’s contribution to the nationwide innovation ecosystem is to offer cutting-edge analysis beneath the steerage of the Nation’s most inventive scientists and engineers. NSF additionally helps improvement of a robust science, know-how, engineering, and arithmetic (STEM) workforce by investing in constructing the information that informs enhancements in STEM instructing and studying.

NSF’s mission requires the broadening of alternatives and increasing participation of teams, establishments, and geographic areas which can be underrepresented in STEM disciplines, which is crucial to the well being and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is dedicated to this precept of range and deems it central to the applications, tasks, and actions it considers and helps.

A. Advantage Evaluate Ideas and Standards

The Nationwide Science Basis strives to spend money on a strong and various portfolio of tasks that creates new information and permits breakthroughs in understanding throughout all areas of science and engineering analysis and schooling. To determine which tasks to help, NSF depends on a advantage overview course of that includes consideration of each the technical elements of a proposed mission and its potential to contribute extra broadly to advancing NSF’s mission “to advertise the progress of science; to advance the nationwide well being, prosperity, and welfare; to safe the nationwide protection; and for different functions.” NSF makes each effort to conduct a good, aggressive, clear advantage overview course of for the collection of tasks.

1. Advantage Evaluate Ideas

These ideas are to be given due diligence by PIs and organizations when getting ready proposals and managing tasks, by reviewers when studying and evaluating proposals, and by NSF program employees when figuring out whether or not or to not suggest proposals for funding and whereas overseeing awards. On condition that NSF is the first federal company charged with nurturing and supporting excellence in fundamental analysis and schooling, the next three ideas apply:

All NSF tasks must be of the best high quality and have the potential to advance, if not remodel, the frontiers of information.
NSF tasks, within the mixture, ought to contribute extra broadly to attaining societal targets. These “Broader Impacts” could also be achieved by means of the analysis itself, by means of actions which can be instantly associated to particular analysis tasks, or by means of actions which can be supported by, however are complementary to, the mission. The mission actions could also be primarily based on beforehand established and/or revolutionary strategies and approaches, however in both case have to be effectively justified.
Significant evaluation and analysis of NSF funded tasks must be primarily based on applicable metrics, conserving in thoughts the doubtless correlation between the impact of broader impacts and the sources supplied to implement tasks. If the scale of the exercise is restricted, analysis of that exercise in isolation will not be more likely to be significant. Thus, assessing the effectiveness of those actions could greatest be accomplished at the next, extra aggregated, stage than the person mission.

With respect to the third precept, even when evaluation of Broader Impacts outcomes for specific tasks is completed at an aggregated stage, PIs are anticipated to be accountable for finishing up the actions described within the funded mission. Thus, particular person tasks ought to embody clearly acknowledged targets, particular descriptions of the actions that the PI intends to do, and a plan in place to doc the outputs of these actions.

These three advantage overview ideas present the premise for the advantage overview standards, in addition to a context inside which the customers of the factors can higher perceive their intent.

2. Advantage Evaluate Standards

All NSF proposals are evaluated by means of use of the 2 Nationwide Science Board accredited advantage overview standards. In some situations, nevertheless, NSF will make use of extra standards as required to focus on the particular targets of sure applications and actions.

The 2 advantage overview standards are listed under. Each standards are to be given full consideration in the course of the overview and decision-making processes; every criterion is important however neither, by itself, is adequate. Subsequently, proposers should absolutely deal with each standards. (PAPPG Chapter II.D.2.d(i). comprises extra data to be used by proposers in improvement of the Venture Description part of the proposal). Reviewers are strongly inspired to overview the factors, together with PAPPG Chapter II.D.2.d(i), previous to the overview of a proposal.

When evaluating NSF proposals, reviewers shall be requested to think about what the proposers wish to do, why they wish to do it, how they plan to do it, how they’ll know in the event that they succeed, and what advantages might accrue if the mission is profitable. These points apply each to the technical elements of the proposal and the way in which through which the mission could make broader contributions. To that finish, reviewers shall be requested to judge all proposals towards two standards:

Mental Advantage: The Mental Advantage criterion encompasses the potential to advance information; and
Broader Impacts: The Broader Impacts criterion encompasses the potential to profit society and contribute to the achievement of particular, desired societal outcomes.

The next components must be thought of within the overview for each standards:

What’s the potential for the proposed exercise to
Advance information and understanding inside its personal discipline or throughout totally different fields (Mental Advantage); and
Profit society or advance desired societal outcomes (Broader Impacts)?

To what extent do the proposed actions counsel and discover inventive, unique, or probably transformative ideas?
Is the plan for finishing up the proposed actions well-reasoned, well-organized, and primarily based on a sound rationale? Does the plan incorporate a mechanism to evaluate success?
How effectively certified is the person, group, or group to conduct the proposed actions?
Are there sufficient sources obtainable to the PI (both on the house group or by means of collaborations) to hold out the proposed actions?

Broader impacts could also be achieved by means of the analysis itself, by means of the actions which can be instantly associated to particular analysis tasks, or by means of actions which can be supported by, however are complementary to, the mission. NSF values the development of scientific information and actions that contribute to achievement of societally related outcomes. Such outcomes embody, however aren’t restricted to: full participation of ladies, individuals with disabilities, and different underrepresented teams in science, know-how, engineering, and arithmetic (STEM); improved STEM schooling and educator improvement at any stage; elevated public scientific literacy and public engagement with science and know-how; improved well-being of people in society; improvement of a various, globally aggressive STEM workforce; elevated partnerships between academia, business, and others; improved nationwide safety; elevated financial competitiveness of the US; and enhanced infrastructure for analysis and schooling.

Proposers are reminded that reviewers can even be requested to overview the Knowledge Administration Plan and the Postdoctoral Researcher Mentoring Plan, as applicable.

Further Solicitation Particular Evaluate Standards

Along with the usual NSF standards for evaluating proposals, reviewers shall be requested to judge the proposal on the next standards:

Proposals ought to clearly clarify the proposed work’s profit to life on earth.
Proposals ought to clearly clarify the need of the ISS to hold out the proposed mission.
Proposals ought to element how experiments shall be performed on the ISS and what, if any, floor experimental controls shall be utilized.
Proposals ought to embody a timeline the place milestones are clearly recognized in the course of the mission.
Proposals ought to specify current or proposed flight {hardware} (together with any crucial modification) for use within the mission. If new {hardware} improvement is proposed, proposals ought to describe design necessities, important parts, floor testing, improvement timelines, and projected improvement prices that match throughout the acknowledged scope.
Proposals ought to embody an Implementation Associate Assertion of Work (SOW) that adequately describes the important thing components listed beneath Supplementary Paperwork: Implementation Associate Assertion of Work.

B. Evaluate and Choice Course of

Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation shall be reviewed by Advert hoc Evaluate and/or Panel Evaluate.

Reviewers shall be requested to judge proposals utilizing two Nationwide Science Board accredited advantage overview standards and, if relevant, extra program particular standards. A abstract ranking and accompanying narrative will typically be accomplished and submitted by every reviewer and/or panel. The Program Officer assigned to handle the proposal’s overview will think about the recommendation of reviewers and can formulate a advice.

After scientific, technical and programmatic overview and consideration of applicable components, the NSF Program Officer recommends to the cognizant Division Director whether or not the proposal must be declined or beneficial for award. NSF strives to have the ability to inform proposers whether or not their proposals have been declined or beneficial for funding inside six months. Massive or notably advanced proposals or proposals from new recipients could require extra overview and processing time. The time interval begins on the deadline or goal date, or receipt date, whichever is later. The interval ends when the Division Director acts upon the Program Officer’s advice.

After programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals beneficial for funding shall be forwarded to the Division of Grants and Agreements or the Division of Acquisition and Cooperative Assist for overview of enterprise, monetary, and coverage implications. After an administrative overview has occurred, Grants and Agreements Officers carry out the processing and issuance of a grant or different settlement. Proposers are cautioned that solely a Grants and Agreements Officer could make commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No dedication on the a part of NSF must be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or group that makes monetary or personnel commitments within the absence of a grant or cooperative settlement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so at their very own threat.

As soon as an award or declination determination has been made, Principal Investigators are supplied suggestions about their proposals. In all instances, evaluations are handled as confidential paperwork. Verbatim copies of evaluations, excluding the names of the reviewers or any reviewer-identifying data, are despatched to the Principal Investigator/Venture Director by the Program Officer. As well as, the proposer will obtain an evidence of the choice to award or decline funding.

VII. AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION

A. Notification of the Award

Notification of the award is made to the submitting group by an NSF Grants and Agreements Officer. Organizations whose proposals are declined shall be suggested as promptly as attainable by the cognizant NSF Program administering this system. Verbatim copies of evaluations, not together with the id of the reviewer, shall be supplied routinely to the Principal Investigator. (See Part VI.B. for added data on the overview course of.)

B. Award Situations

An NSF award consists of: (1) the award discover, which incorporates any particular provisions relevant to the award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the price range, which signifies the quantities, by classes of expense, on which NSF has primarily based its help (or in any other case communicates any particular approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced within the award discover; (4) the relevant award circumstances, similar to Grant Normal Situations (GC-1)*; or Analysis Phrases and Situations* and (5) any announcement or different NSF issuance that could be included by reference within the award discover. Cooperative agreements are also administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative Settlement Monetary and Administrative Phrases and Situations (CA-FATC) and the relevant Programmatic Phrases and Situations. NSF awards are electronically signed by an NSF Grants and Agreements Officer and transmitted electronically to the group by way of e-mail.

*These paperwork could also be accessed electronically on NSF’s Web site at https://www.nsf.gov/awards/managing/award_conditions.jsp?org=NSF. Paper copies could also be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, phone (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail from [email protected].

Extra complete data on NSF Award Situations and different vital data on the administration of NSF awards is contained within the NSF Proposal & Award Insurance policies & Procedures Information (PAPPG) Chapter VII, obtainable electronically on the NSF Web site at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.

Administrative and Nationwide Coverage Necessities

Construct America, Purchase America

As expressed in Government Order 14005, Guaranteeing the Future is Made in All of America by All of America’s Staff (86 FR 7475), it’s the coverage of the manager department to make use of phrases and circumstances of Federal monetary help awards to maximise, in keeping with legislation, using items, merchandise, and supplies produced in, and companies supplied in, the US.

Per the necessities of the Construct America, Purchase America Act (Pub. L. 117-58, Division G, Title IX, Subtitle A, November 15, 2021), no funding made obtainable by means of this funding alternative could also be obligated for an award until all iron, metal, manufactured merchandise, and building supplies used within the mission are produced in the US. For added data, go to NSF’s Construct America, Purchase America webpage.

Particular Award Situations:

Joint NSF/CASIS recipients shall be required to incorporate applicable acknowledgement of NSF and CASIS help in studies and/or publications of labor carried out beneath this award. An instance of such an acknowledgement is: “This materials relies upon work supported by NSF and CASIS beneath Award No. [Recipient should enter the awarding entities award number(s)].”

Recipients shall be required to submit annual and closing mission studies to NSF and interim progress studies to CASIS to make sure well timed execution of the flight experiments.

C. Reporting Necessities

For all multi-year grants (together with each commonplace and persevering with grants), the Principal Investigator should submit an annual mission report back to the cognizant Program Officer no later than 90 days previous to the top of the present price range interval. (Some applications or awards require submission of extra frequent mission studies). No later than 120 days following expiration of a grant, the PI is also required to submit a closing mission report, and a mission outcomes report for most people.

Failure to offer the required annual or closing mission studies, or the mission outcomes report, will delay NSF overview and processing of any future funding increments in addition to any pending proposals for all recognized PIs and co-PIs on a given award. PIs ought to look at the codecs of the required studies prematurely to guarantee availability of required knowledge.

PIs are required to make use of NSF’s digital project-reporting system, obtainable by means of Analysis.gov, for preparation and submission of annual and closing mission studies. Such studies present data on accomplishments, mission contributors (particular person and organizational), publications, and different particular merchandise and impacts of the mission. Submission of the report by way of Analysis.gov constitutes certification by the PI that the contents of the report are correct and full. The mission outcomes report additionally have to be ready and submitted utilizing Analysis.gov. This report serves as a quick abstract, ready particularly for the general public, of the character and outcomes of the mission. This report shall be posted on the NSF web site precisely as it’s submitted by the PI.

Extra complete data on NSF Reporting Necessities and different vital data on the administration of NSF awards is contained within the NSF Proposal & Award Insurance policies & Procedures Information (PAPPG) Chapter VII, obtainable electronically on the NSF Web site at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.

VIII. AGENCY CONTACTS

Please be aware that this system contact data is present on the time of publishing. See program web site for any updates to the factors of contact.

Normal inquiries concerning this program must be made to:

For questions associated to using NSF techniques contact:

NSF Assist Desk: 1-800-381-1532
Analysis.gov Assist Desk e-mail: [email protected]

For questions regarding Grants.gov contact:

Grants.gov Contact Heart: If the Licensed Organizational Representatives (AOR) has not acquired a affirmation message from Grants.gov inside 48 hours of submission of utility, please contact by way of phone: 1-800-518-4726; e-mail: [email protected].

IX. OTHER INFORMATION

The NSF web site offers essentially the most complete supply of knowledge on NSF Directorates (together with contact data), applications and funding alternatives. Use of this web site by potential proposers is strongly inspired. As well as, “NSF Replace” is an information-delivery system designed to maintain potential proposers and different events apprised of recent NSF funding alternatives and publications, vital adjustments in proposal and award insurance policies and procedures, and upcoming NSF Grants Conferences. Subscribers are knowledgeable by means of e-mail or the consumer’s Internet browser every time new publications are issued that match their recognized pursuits. “NSF Replace” additionally is obtainable on NSF’s web site.

Grants.gov offers a further digital functionality to seek for Federal government-wide grant alternatives. NSF funding alternatives could also be accessed by way of this mechanism. Additional data on Grants.gov could also be obtained at https://www.grants.gov.

In regards to the Heart for the Development of Science in House (CASIS)

The Heart for the Development of Science in House (CASIS) is an Inside Income Code Part 501(c)(3) entity answerable for administration of the Worldwide House Station (ISS) U.S. Nationwide Laboratory beneath a Cooperative Settlement with NASA (80JSC018M0005). Per Part 504 of the NASA Authorization Act of 2010, the aim of CASIS is to maximise the worth of the funding the U.S. authorities made within the ISS Nationwide Lab and display the scientific and technological productiveness of the ISS Nationwide Lab over the following decade. CASIS seeks to advance scientific analysis, know-how improvement, and schooling together with utilization of the ISS, managing a various analysis, know-how, and schooling portfolio throughout a broad vary of scientific fields.

CASIS Targets

Stimulate, develop, and handle U.S. nationwide makes use of of the ISS Nationwide Lab by U.S. authorities businesses, tutorial establishments, and personal corporations; and
Develop instruments and strategies to speak the worth of makes use of of the ISS analysis platform, and improve the return on the U.S. funding within the ISS Nationwide Lab.

The Heart for Development of Science in House could also be reached at:

6905 N. Wickham Highway, Suite 500
Melbourne, FL 32940
Telephone: (321) 253-5101

ABOUT THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

The Nationwide Science Basis (NSF) is an unbiased Federal company created by the Nationwide Science Basis Act of 1950, as amended (42 USC 1861-75). The Act states the aim of the NSF is “to advertise the progress of science; [and] to advance the nationwide well being, prosperity, and welfare by supporting analysis and schooling in all fields of science and engineering.”

NSF funds analysis and schooling in most fields of science and engineering. It does this by means of grants and cooperative agreements to greater than 2,000 faculties, universities, Ok-12 college techniques, companies, casual science organizations and different analysis organizations all through the US. The Basis accounts for about one-fourth of Federal help to tutorial establishments for fundamental analysis.

NSF receives roughly 55,000 proposals annually for analysis, schooling and coaching tasks, of which roughly 11,000 are funded. As well as, the Basis receives a number of thousand functions for graduate and postdoctoral fellowships. The company operates no laboratories itself however does help Nationwide Analysis Facilities, consumer amenities, sure oceanographic vessels and Arctic and Antarctic analysis stations. The Basis additionally helps cooperative analysis between universities and business, US participation in worldwide scientific and engineering efforts, and academic actions at each tutorial stage.

Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) present funding for particular help or gear to allow individuals with disabilities to work on NSF-supported tasks. See the NSF Proposal & Award Insurance policies & Procedures Information Chapter II.F.7 for directions concerning preparation of a lot of these proposals.

The Nationwide Science Basis has Telephonic Machine for the Deaf (TDD) and Federal Data Relay Service (FIRS) capabilities that allow people with listening to impairments to speak with the Basis about NSF applications, employment or normal data. TDD could also be accessed at (703) 292-5090 and (800) 281-8749, FIRS at (800) 877-8339.

The Nationwide Science Basis Data Heart could also be reached at (703) 292-5111.

The Nationwide Science Basis promotes and advances scientific progress in the US by competitively awarding grants and cooperative agreements for analysis and schooling within the sciences, arithmetic, and engineering.

To get the newest details about program deadlines, to obtain copies of NSF publications, and to entry abstracts of awards, go to the NSF Web site at https://www.nsf.gov

2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314

For Normal Data(NSF Data Heart):

(703) 292-5111

TDD (for the hearing-impaired):

(703) 292-5090

To Order Publications or Varieties:


 

Ship an e-mail to:

[email protected]

or phone:

(703) 292-8134

(703) 292-5111

PRIVACY ACT AND PUBLIC BURDEN STATEMENTS

The knowledge requested on proposal types and mission studies is solicited beneath the authority of the Nationwide Science Basis Act of 1950, as amended. The knowledge on proposal types shall be utilized in reference to the collection of certified proposals; and mission studies submitted by proposers shall be used for program analysis and reporting throughout the Government Department and to Congress. The knowledge requested could also be disclosed to certified reviewers and employees assistants as a part of the proposal overview course of; to proposer establishments/grantees to offer or receive knowledge concerning the proposal overview course of, award selections, or the administration of awards; to authorities contractors, consultants, volunteers and researchers and educators as crucial to finish assigned work; to different authorities businesses or different entities needing data concerning proposers or nominees as a part of a joint utility overview course of, or as a way to coordinate applications or coverage; and to a different Federal company, court docket, or celebration in a court docket or Federal administrative continuing if the federal government is a celebration. Details about Principal Investigators could also be added to the Reviewer file and used to pick out potential candidates to function peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See System of File Notices, NSF-50, “Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Related Information,” and NSF-51, “Reviewer/Proposal File and Related Information.” Submission of the data is voluntary. Failure to offer full and full data, nevertheless, could scale back the opportunity of receiving an award.

An company could not conduct or sponsor, and an individual will not be required to answer, an data assortment until it shows a sound Workplace of Administration and Funds (OMB) management quantity. The OMB management quantity for this assortment is 3145-0058. Public reporting burden for this assortment of knowledge is estimated to common 120 hours per response, together with the time for reviewing directions. Ship feedback concerning the burden estimate and another side of this assortment of knowledge, together with recommendations for decreasing this burden, to:

Suzanne H. Plimpton
Reviews Clearance Officer
Coverage Workplace, Division of Establishment and Award Assist
Workplace of Funds, Finance, and Award Administration
Nationwide Science Basis
Alexandria, VA 22314